Fatah, Hamas say deal reached on Palestinian elections
Jerusalem Post Middle East. They worked for the PA security forces in the Gaza Strip beforewhen Hamas seized control of the coastal enclave, Palestinian sources said.
The four men were released as part of an agreement reached between Fatah and Hamas on the first day of the Cairo talks, the sources said. Hamas officials said they were now expecting the PA to reciprocate by halting its security crackdown on Hamas members in the West Bank. The changes allow Abbas to appoint the president of the Supreme Judicial Council, the body that appoints judges.
Fatah and Hamas agreed that PA policemen would be permitted to deploy in the Gaza Strip to maintain law and order during the elections, it quoted unnamed sources as saying. Meanwhile, a delegation representing the Palestinian Central Elections Commission arrived in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday to discuss arrangements for holding the elections.
The delegation members will meet with representatives of several Palestinian factions and brief them on preparations for holding the vote. Last month, Abbas issued decrees that set dates for holding parliamentary, presidential and Palestinian National Council PNC elections in three phases. The parliamentary election will be held on May 22, the presidential election on July 31 and the PNC election on August Subscribe for our daily newsletter. Hot Opinion. Will Israel's next war with Hezbollah be started by a robot?Multiworld plugin pocketmine
The dialogue included reconciliation, holding elections and rejecting all projects, that plan to liquidate the Palestinian cause. Basem Naim basemn63 September 24, Following the polls, Hamas and Fatah formed a unity government but it soon collapsed and bloody clashes erupted in the Gaza Strip between the two factions the following year. Numerous attempts at reconciliation, including a prisoner exchange agreement in and a short-lived unity government two years later, have failed to close the rift.
The accords break with decades of Arab consensus that ties with Israel should not be normalised until it has signed a comprehensive peace deal with the Palestinians. Foreign ministers from France, Egypt, Germany and Jordan back beginning of talks on the basis of two-state solution. Despite the differences between the two Palestinian parties, they have managed to reach a deal to end their divide.
Arab, European states call Israel and Palestine to restart talks. Hamas and Fatah: How are the two groups different? Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas to hold talks in Ankara.Hamas-Fatah Agreement: Reconciliation deal raises hopes in Gaza Strip
The two rivals will discuss ending the internal division and holding general elections. More from News. Ethiopia: Concern grows over health of jailed political leaders. Most Read. White House says no call planned to Saudi Arabia.
Doge days: Elon Musk and Tesla place double bet on cryptocurrency. Donald Trump acquitted on charge of inciting US Capitol riot.This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas said Tuesday they had agreed on the "mechanisms" for forthcoming elections and to respect their outcome.
In a joint statement on the second day of talks between Palestinian factions in Cairo, they said they had agreed a timeline for the polls and "committed to respecting and accepting their results".
The deal provides for an "electoral court" with exclusive jurisdiction over the electoral process and any cases arising from the polls, the first in 15 years.
The Fatah-Hamas Agreement
The Islamist movement Hamas won an unexpected landslide at the last elections ina victory not recognised by president Mahmud Abbas's Fatah. Fatah has since run the Palestinian Authority in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Hamas has held power in the Gaza Strip sincethe year Israel imposed a devastating blockade on the coastal enclave.
In their statement, the factions said polling "must take place in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, without exception" and committed to allowing "public liberties and The deal also includes commitments to immediately release all prisoners detained "on factional grounds or in relation to freedom of opinion", the statement says. The parliamentary and presidential polls, set for May and July respectively, are the first in 15 years. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law.
For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at or visit www. We've detected you are on Internet Explorer. For the best Barrons. Sign In. Text size. The parliamentary and presidential polls are set for May 22 and July 31, respectively. That led to bloody clashes the following year and a split in Palestinian governance. The Barron's news department was not involved in the creation of the content above. This story was produced by AFP. For more information go to AFP.
Thank you This article has been sent to. Privacy Notice. Cookie Notice. Copyright Policy. Data Policy.
Fatah–Hamas Doha Agreement
Your Ad Choices. Barron's Archive. All Rights Reserved. All Rights Reserved This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.Member State of the Arab League. The Fatah—Hamas reconciliation process refers to a series of reconciliation attempts to resolve the hostility between Fatah and Hamas since the — Fatah—Hamas conflict and Hamas' subsequent takeover of the Gaza Strip.
Despite a number of agreements, those attempts have not yet been successful, with Hamas still exercising full control of the Gaza Strip, despite the formation of the "unity government" in June Israel and the United States have effectively opposed reconciliation. InHamas arose as a resistance movement against the Israeli occupation. Following the Oslo Accordsthe PLO, of which Fatah still was the dominant member, formally denounced armed resistance. Under pressure of Israel and the international community, Fatah attempted to eliminate Hamas, especially after Mahmoud Abbas had succeeded Arafat as President of the Palestinian National Authority.
Tensions mounted ahead the Israeli disengagement from Gaza in and culminated in the Battle of Gaza in Juneresulting in a split of the Palestinian government. In reconciliation attempts, Hamas has mainly focussed on reform of the PLO and its inclusion in the organisation. After Hamas' victory in the electionsit unsuccessfully tried to run the PA Government due to Israeli and international boycott. Although Hamas has maintained that it is ready to conclude a long-term truce with Israel hudnait has vowed to never recognize Israel, because this would imply the recognition of the "Zionist occupation of Palestine", which Hamas views as an Arab Islamic country.
In the view of Hamas, recognition of Israel would imply the acceptance of the expulsion of more thanPalestinians during the Nakba during the Arab—Israeli war. Hamas' refusal to recognize Israel and denounce armed resistance, unlike the PLO and implicitly Fatah, has been the main reason for Israel and the international community to oppose the reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas. Fatah has met with massive external pressure not to cooperate with Hamas.
Israel has consistently objected to Hamas being included in any PA government. Infor example, Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel would never make peace with Hamas and "cannot accept Hamas as a negotiating partner". There is no possibility for peace with both" and "How can you talk to us about peace when you're talking about peace with Hamas. You can choose [to make] peace with Israel or you can choose peace with Hamas".
President Abbas has consistently been under pressure not to make any deal with Hamas. Inan Israeli official declared that Israel would cut its ties with the PA if it brought Hamas into its government.
When eventually a national unity government was formed inwithout any Hamas ministers,  Israel nevertheless condemned the unity government, imposed sanctions on the new PA government and ended peace talks with Abbas.
One of the effective means of pressure at times used by Israel is withholding of taxes it collects on behalf of the PA. Israel collectively punished the Palestinians, for example, following the formation of the PA government and the successive unity governmentfollowing the May reconciliation agreement and after UN applications.
The Declaration reaffirmed the status of the Palestine Liberation Organization PLO as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people  through the participation in it of all forces and factions according to democratic principles.
It also called for unity of the Palestinian factions against the Israeli occupation and avoidance of further violent interactions between the Palestinian groups. It was written with the intention to reconcile all factions and unite them in their struggle against the Israeli occupation and form a government of national unity. It envisioned an independent Palestinian state within the borderswith al-Quds al-Shareef as its capital.
President Abbas immediately endorsed the Document, which implicitly recognizes Israel. He demanded, however, that Hamas explicitly approve it, threatening with a national referendum on the Document. Eventually, the political leadership of all factions endorsed a revised version of the Prisoners' Document. Hamas refused, however, to explicitly recognize Israel and to forswear armed resistance within the occupied territories.
Israel quickly dismissed the Document because it did not explicitly recognize Israel.Translations of this item:. There is the criminal failure of the international community, as both accomplice and accessory before the fact, to make any meaningful effort to prevent endless salvoes of terrorist rocket attacks against Israeli civilians for over nine years.
As we saw with the Iranian arms shipment aboard the Klos-C last month, Iran's sponsorship of terrorism continues unabated -- even as the international community is rehabilitating its extremist regime.
Three hundred and thirty two drone attacks against Al Qaida and Taliban targets on Pakistani territory since demonstrate U. President Barack Obama's strong resolve against terrorists that threaten the United States.
Only last week, the latest wave of air strikes launched or enabled by his government against Al Qaida networks in Yemen killed 55 suspected extremists, possibly including master bomb-maker Ibrahim al-Asiri. Of course no one expects the U.
But one could hope for something more forceful from Washington than State Department spokesman Jen Psaki's weak and vacillating response in which she attempted to take the heat off Hamas and the PA by taking a gratuitous dig at Israel. Like America and several other countries, the EU designates Hamas as a terrorist organization. Though shameful, this is far from surprising. It is part of a lengthy pattern of witting or unwitting EU encouragement of Middle Eastern terrorism.
The EU has contributed its taxpayers' money to paying the salaries of convicted Palestinian terrorists via unconditional donations to the PA amounting to billions of dollars since Some of this money has also been spent on school textbooks, television programs and other PA propaganda that incite hatred and terrorism against Israel.
Ashton and the EU have called repeatedly for an end to the Israeli-Egyptian security operation on land and sea around Gaza. The operation is designed to prevent predominantly Iranian-supplied munitions and materiel for terrorism from entering the Gaza Strip, and to stop Gaza terrorists and weapons moving to attack Israeli or Egyptian targets.
At the same time, the EU, like the UN, has usually remained mute in the face of volley after volley of Iranian-supported rocket attacks from Gaza directed against the civilian population of Israel.
These rockets are fired mainly by Hamas and their terrorist bedfellows, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Silence and inaction by such significant international bodies as the UN and the EU must, in these circumstances, add up to at least a degree of culpability. Robert Serry, the UN Special Coordinator for the Peace Process, seems to have swallowed Abbas's suggestion to him that reconciliation with Hamas will be on the basis of "recognition of Israel, non-violence and adherence to previous agreements.
Were Hamas indeed to commit -- plausibly -- to such undertakings, then Israel could of course continue peace negotiations and cooperation with the PA on current terms. But other than Abbas's words to Serry, there is no indication of this and, in the real world, Hamas is not likely even to consider such conditions. Prime Minister Netanyahu therefore had no choice other than to suspend the peace process. This was his obligation to the Israeli people and to the international community.
How could he possibly continue to negotiate with an entity that is itself negotiating with a vicious, murderous and unrelenting terrorist group hell-bent on the destruction of Israel and outlawed around the world? Of course Abbas knew full well when he agreed to unity with Hamas that this would end the peace negotiations.Fourteen Palestinian factions attending a summit in Cairo announced on Tuesday night that they have reached an agreement that would set the guidelines for the first Palestinian national elections in nearly 15 years.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas issued a decree in mid-January ordering three successive rounds of Palestinian national elections. The first round — for the currently defunct Palestinian legislature — is set to be held on May Observers are skeptical, however, that elections will actually take place.
Abbas has vowed to hold elections several times since his four-year term ostensibly expired in However, repeated attempts to hold votes for president and parliament have flopped, largely due to the mistrust between rivals Fatah and terror group Hamas, and their inability to agree on terms. The agreement announced on Monday night commits all sides to the immediate release of political prisoners and to allow members of the other faction to campaign in their territory.
Both Fatah and Hamas have regularly cracked down on activity by the other movement in areas they administer. The agreement also called for the appointment of an election court with members from Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. Before his defeat inAbbas effectively drained an independent court of its powers to constrain the presidency.
Critics of the Palestinian Authority president — and his Hamas rivals — had expressed concern that he might do so again. Another key issue taken up by the participants was whose security forces would oversee the polling stations.
The international community boycotted the government, with many countries refusing to work with the terror group. Tensions between the two sides exploded into open war inleading to a bloody struggle for control of the Gaza Strip. Fatah lost and was largely expelled from the coastal enclave to the West Bank, where Abbas announced an emergency government by executive fiat. Sincetwo rival Palestinian governments have held sway in the West Bank and Gaza. Several reconciliation agreements since then have fallen through, and unlike in previous election pushes, no reconciliation agreement preceded this election decree.
If so, please join The Times of Israel Community. So now we have a request. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community. View comments Hide comments. Stay updated.The parties agreed to form an interim national consensus government composed of independent technocrats, to prepare for upcoming elections.
The envisioned government did not materialize. President Mahmoud Abbas would head a unity caretaker cabinet. The Cabinet would be composed of independent technocrats.
The task of the new government would be the preparation for upcoming elections and also overseeing reconstruction efforts in the Gaza Strip. While the European Union supported the Palestinian reconciliation and elections as important steps toward an eventual Israeli—Palestinian peace deal, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the agreement, saying it would be impossible to reach peace with a government that included Hamas.
He said "It is either peace with Hamas or peace with Israel.Tecnica fur boots size chart
You can't have them both". On 18 FebruaryAbbas drew anger from Hamas by declaring that "the next government will remain committed to the obligations and agreements signed by the Palestine Liberation Organisation". According to Hamas, the remarks violated the agreements because the next government would be a national unity government, which "is everyone's government, not one of a particular political group [and] has no political program".
On MayHamas and Fatah signed a further agreement in Cairo for new unity government and implementation of Palestinian elections, three and a half months after the Doha agreement. The new Cairo agreement essentially took steps to carry out the previous Doha agreement, particularly the registering of new voters in the Gaza Strip and the formation of an interim government.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Not to be confused with Doha Agreement. Main article: Fatah—Hamas Cairo Agreement. New York Times, 20 May Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file.Baldurs gate ii enhanced edition
Download as PDF Printable version.
- Norgil m suspension in hindi
- Xerox jamaica montego bay
- Roberto quintanilla psicologo
- Disattivare 4g voce vodafone
- Beaker folk of husborne crawley: rolling your is
- Bollywood songs download mp4
- Gembok motor matic
- Portuguese language
- Pgf golf clubs nz
- Lucien albrecht brut rose near me
- 4 antenna router positioning tp link
- Board member appointment letter example
- Diagnostic code spn 3226 fmi 20
- Q tips target
- Goedkope meubels online belgie
- Borte cause of death
- 8990 lakes blvd
- Smashing simba cartoon pogo
- Poprad webkamera namestie
- Kelebihan solat tahajud